Cblast I'm going to reach out here and I know I probably shouldn't as our threads almost always go ugly. So here goes Nothing.
First let me say this as a 26 year mechanic, the thing that hurts me the most as a tradesmen is placing the words in ink on a work order that was given to me "I Can Not Duplicate" It's insulting. My feeling is I'm Not trying hard enough. So when do we as mechanics stop spending customers money in our search ? At some point we have to say mercy because no one wants pay for Zero results That being said there is a need to place ourselves in the shoes of both parties.
In this case the unknown mechanic let the customer down. As you will read above and almost everywhere in every case people launch into attack mode. Why ? Because it's the Easiest thing to do in our frustration & disappointment,,,,, This man's intentions were sound and he meant well although the results were less than desirable
.
So do we as a customer Lynch the Mechanic or try and understand what happened ? Is he making the best effort to fix the problem. We Mechanics do not like letting customers down, Ever, but it does happen. It's simply unavoidable.
Obviously a flash issue.
Yes this is very True and very clear.
They can't 'use the same performance file', and just cram it over everyone's ecu. It doesn't work like that.
Do we or anyone know that's what this Mechanic did ? or are we judging him unfairly ?
It doesn't work like that. The locations of the files inside the ecu change locations based on whether ur bike has abs or not etc. When flashing, the actual files have to be flashed over the correct files in the correct locations or an ecu can become corrupted very easily. The numbers don't 'fit' in the wrong spot. All of it then needs to be triple checked and verified.
Now the answer is being provided to a problem that has Not Yet Been Diagnosed. Ask yourself, Is this Fair ?
Fuel maps in all cylinders need to be unified,
This is News to me. I never do it. I follow the same way Kawi does it. Both ways work just fine but I like not changing the path already used in the ECU. Something about using a direction not taken by Mother Kawi and taking on the short cut used by the software developer I find Risky although I know it works just fine,,, just saying. End result can be achieved both ways. This is most certainly not the issue.
ALL maps for all separate gears need to be checked.
Yes all needs to be checked that goes with out saying. Or pay 900 for A new one. Been there done that got the T-Shirt lol
Guys there is so much more here that will come out later in the wash but for now please keep a open mind when it comes to this New Tech. It is not flawless and there will be some growing pains.
Anyway hope I made all who read think a bit,,,, if not,,,Lynch. Playing Devils advocate can get you into trouble, but least I tried. Cheers.