Those claims never took into account of the RAM air effect as mentioned by Romans in this very thread.
The dyno tests prove it looses 2-3 hp with flies out and without ram air. Race tests indicate it's fastest with ram air and without flies. It would sure be interesting to hear some hypothesis about why this might be the case. Cooler air with ram air and maybe a small amount of pressurization in the air box? On the dyno with static air to the intake, the flies produce some kind of turbulence that is beneficial in the upper revs? ...but that turbulence actually is detrimental with ram air? Is it just as good to make the flies 100% open all the time as opposed to removing them? That's a lot of questions for 2-3 peak hp. I'd save those for competition racing. If it has an extra kick in the low to midrange, I'd take it!
I'll try something with my flies ASAP but I'd like to ride the bike stock more to make an accurate assessment. Did you need to adjust the fueling to get the benefit of flies opening earlier?
I referred to my Gen1's weakness below 3000 rpm in this years back in this thread. I was extremely impressed with its ability to accelerate smoothly from 2000 rpm in 6th gear after tuning. Probably, flies out on that bike optimized the improvement. I'll take that on my new Gen2 for sure but in all honesty, it woul be extremely rare that I would run the bike at or below 3000 rpm when riding fast. If it's a technical corner in road racing, just downshift a gear even into 1 if it's that slow of a corner. If my minimum rpm in sport riding is 4000, does it even make a difference if I do anything with the flies?
Thanks for reviving the thread. There's so much that has been learned that seems to be getting overlooked in the past ten years
* Last updated by: Rook on 9/11/2024 @ 5:03 PM *