I agree Slow.
I called bull on his story right off the bat. Especially as he backpedaled to try to get out of it, but it was already in print.
I've seen this online so often I can't count the times some little punk not more than 15 years old claims something that fits the saying, "if its too good to be true, it isn't" to a T.
I doubt the dyno jpeg was legitimate, or even of his bike.
BG has never said if the two posting IDs were the same IP address or not. But I've seen that before, where someone clones themselves under a different ID to try to bolster what the original ID is claiming.
I'd almost drive down to Hunstville, or rather ride, just to force him to follow me to the drag strip and run.
And nobody can hack the ECU. You can replace the EPROM complete if you have the image and change parts of it, but that means you have to understand the structure of the ECU's memory image, and thats probably a closely held secret at Kawasaki.
You could hack the signals coming into it, and out of it with an external device, like a piggy. But not whats "inside" the ECU.
I knew the guys at Amdahl Corporation who reverse engineered the IBM cpu and microcode on the OS370 mainframe computer. Since IBM owns copyright and patent on the actual internals, they couldn't even "print it out" and use that to based a clone machine on. They had to try all possible inputs and see what the outputs were and then design hardware and microcode which would do the same thing. In the end, if it ran MVS (the operating system software) correctly, it was a success.
Those guys could hack a ZX14 ECU by developing an electronic device which was "plug-compatible" and replaced the OEM ECU. Which means they COULD add TC and ABS and all sorts of goodies because they wouldn't be contrained by the actual internal structure and microcode of the OEM ECU.
But there wouldn't be enough money in it to entice guys like that, who make a cool M$ on a bad year.
* Last updated by: privateer on 7/15/2011 @ 12:27 PM *
Living the Gypsy Life