I still don't get your point, Hub. The cost of Costco stock is vastly greater than many stocks, in general, and Lowes in particular. Its not a decision I ever made in favor of taking a position in. I make other choices.
Picking out one I didn't take a position in, is.... irrelevant.
I missed the Apple IPO that is the only one I ever missed that I cared about.
My eBay has gone from 10 to 33. Not bad. I'm watching it on ETrade trying to decide if I should cut and run and move it into my State retirement fund, where it would be insured and safe.
My Lowes has gone from 1.01 to 60 to 2X Split to 21 (now). Nine more bucks anytime in the next couple years, and I've doubled the balance that went into the split, plus the neary $30 average increase per share in value of my holdings pre-split.
My Amdahl went from 10 to 29 to 2 to 12 before I cut and ran, and rolled it into a 401k. I left 2,800 option shares on the table when I left the company, because my option price was 16 and the stock was selling on the NYSE for 6. In 1997 Amdahl ceased to exist. I saw that coming, with time to spare.
I never said I make all the right decisions, nor do I catch every good wave.
Whats your point?
Here is what I said: a) Lowes WILL go above $30 over the new 2 years, and b) the problem with the economy (and hence the stock market) is not a housing market problem, its a bad President, bad Congress, unsustainable debt problem which is freezing funds in place and damping down hiring drastically.
Only by returning to supply-side free enterprise principles can the problem be solved.. and if the American people are smart in 2012 this will happen. If they aren't smart, well, then they deserve what they get, and I'll cut and run and only make a quarter of a million, which is not what I was planning on having in 2014.
I'm tired of repeating myself, so I'll stop.