Keep it the way it is, take and leave what you want...free speech for all
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Created on: 05/17/11 12:00 AM
Replies: 30
matt1414
Location: nsw, Aust
Joined: 09/28/10
Posts: 108
privateer
Location: [random forest]
Joined: 02/16/09
Posts: 3605
RE: POLL: Moderation or not?
05/18/11 5:48 PM
It is one thing to debate issues and argue points of view, and quite another to attack someone personally. In my experience when the latter happens, it is because someone is immature and lacking in civilized debate skills.
In other words, people that personalize debates or discussions simply because they disagree show themselves to be stupid and unable to logically respond. Testosterone fails to impress in the absence of maturity.
I say let them, it is amusing. But the forum would have a better signal-to-noise ratio with more logic and less bullshit.
Hub
Joined: 02/05/09
Posts: 13917
RE: POLL: Moderation or not?
05/18/11 9:44 PM
It is one thing to debate issues and argue points of view, and quite another to attack someone personally.Good post, Privvy. Agree/Disagree. Debate a point, you have to do some heavy convincing. Arguing, well, let me think here. If we argue there is moving air at BDC, I think there is no argument. If you show the debater it's concept in a practical event, how could the argument continue? If I say the coin is going to stop once I drop it at the bottom of the glass, the argument has to continue thru the glass to continue the debate the coin did not stop. Now, the argument is do we shoot him now or ass if something might change? If nothing has changed on the penny in the glass as if we are going to get change from it...
In my experience when the latter happens, it is because someone is immature and lacking in civilized debate skills.I know who said it, holding back my ??? I was so far ahead of the OP's post because I thought he had an interesting scenario. I can see how he would be ignored, but I was off on his abstract. As far as I'm concerned, take that one variable and head off with it... And really, no pun intended because this will grow roots you head in any direction with it... Again, no pun intended.
In other words, people that personalize debates or discussions simply because they disagree show themselves to be stupid and unable to logically respond.Interesting. I think he was blindsided than your comment. He's not stupid by any means. He is the opposite of ROOK. The way Rook would keep asking dynamic questions you already knew and had no time for. I whaled into his noviceness and now he's How-Toe'inn the HOW-To sections.
Testosterone fails to impress in the absence of maturity.As far as another interesting comment, I'd be looking for a kid like this = FIRE!
I say let them, it is amusing. But the forum would have a better signal-to-noise ratio with more logic and less bullshit.Thumb under my chin icon. Keep busting my chops signals? You guys are the logic. Fire and Ice are the BS.. BTW, where is match is?
Rook
Joined: 03/28/09
Posts: 21238
RE: POLL: Moderation or not?
05/18/11 10:11 PM
DO YOU SEE DOUBLES
Take a look at the 6th girl from the left. There is someone elses' butt posed with her arm and head above. I guess she did not have a good enough ass? but they liked her face and got a butt double for her?
I know, I know-- it is really disturbing that I would notice that.
.....or is it her butt?
* Last updated by: Rook on 5/18/2011 @ 10:14 PM *
privateer
Location: [random forest]
Joined: 02/16/09
Posts: 3605
Hub
Joined: 02/05/09
Posts: 13917
RE: POLL: Moderation or not?
05/19/11 6:42 AM
I need a decodering.
Did you say 6th from the righthereshe is or 'sex from them, right?' I bought a pack of commas. Thought I'd try one out.
It doesn't look like they've been to packistandit who peedin the pool? You'd have to ask ohfathom if he recognizes the line up?
I'm about to light the BBQ. You seen Match IS?
New Post
Please login to post a response.