I've not had Shinkos nor a 200 so I'm not entirely certain. M7RRs I've had 190/50 and 190/55 (current) on my bike. I have another set, 50, in the wings (and a set of Q3 50).
Ride is medium. The most noticeable trait is a little front end vibration. Both sets I had did this, it's not really annoying or detracting, but it is noticeable. I'd almost say it's like the front tire is trying to communicate feedback just at the wrong frequency. I don't need to feel each pebble in the asphalts surface.
Turn in is lighter/easier even with 50s. IMO if 55s turn in quicker/lighter it's marginally so.
I've had M5s (least favorite/heavy sluggish steering), Q3 50, S20 Evo 55 (many better options, dangerous at the end), Diablo Rosso IIs (55)(probably my favorite overall), and M7RRs (50 & 55).
The Rosso IIs what was so incredible about those was feedback. There were times I could feel rolling over cracks in the pavement. To be fair, when I had Q3s on the bike my riding skills were probably merely OK. I've just never had an experience of feedback like the Rosso IIs provided. It was like reading braille. Also I think I would've preferred the Rosso IIs in 50, they were a very unstable tire (in the good way) and 55 made it difficult to modulate lean in longer corners (especially early on).
I have a feeling we've given up some traction and grip for wear. I was a little scared of the Rosso IIs at first, since they only had "soft" compound on the very outer tread edge (but what beautiful tread area...basically a slick). I just started slogging them things harder and harder and they never flinched. I have a feeling the 75% middle section of rear tire was probably softer compound than M7RRs ore Rosso IIIs.
I'll probably try Rosso IIIs next although I don't really have any where to ride anymore.