New Bazzaz software version for 2010:

I will see if it also corrects the "0" (zero) bug where when the AFR the user selects for mapping ='s the AFR already on the map, a 0 is shown.

- multiple target AFR's at once - that will be nice. No more messing about with numerous setups and days of riding to get the various AFR's incorporated into the map.

- new "smoothing" feature corrects "abnormal spikes" in the fuel map (fuel drops also?)

- Throttle Position Sensor Calibration - hey, they said that this wasn't necessary before! - "accounting for slight variations between different bikes".

I noticed that on this software, not yet connected to the bike, I can enter a percentage higher than 50% fuel, up to 63% it seems.

I know that at the dyno the tuners have been instructed to tune each cylinder separately. This software allows for "fuel trim" by gear and cylinder. On the PC III (and above), I believe I could map for each cylinder separately. On the M 109 I could. It would be nice to be able to AFR map the Bazzaz gadget maps in this advanced method, as well. And being able to map for each gear separately.

If it wasn't for the PITA in removing this thing, I might try a Motty.

* Last updated by: JDC on 3/14/2010 @ 12:08 AM *

Spoke with Ron from Bazzaz today about the AFR page. The new AFR additions have been incorporated into their Self Mapping tab, under the Mapping box, top right button, which selects between AFR/Fuel Add %/Target AFR.

Selecting Target AFR, then you simply select highlight the map cells you wish to map at a certain AFR, and enter the target AFR, then move on to select another target cell area, and so on. Very nice. Will try that out today, also incorporating Kruz's no pop ideas.

Kruz's no decel pop idea is to richen up the lower TP fuel cells - higher RPM ranges, so that when the throttle is let off the mix is rich and so pops less.

So far I have richened up the 4-10K, TP's 0 -10%, to 30 percent (?) . That has not decreased the decel pop. I'm going to richen up to 20% TP in that same RPM range and see what happens.

I say ? to the 'percent' because the fuel cells now, on my PC, allow me to enter values up to 63, rather than 50 max (plus 13 for 'trim') = possible max of 63 before. If this remains true when the map loads, then that 30 number is not really an accurate "percentage". In speaking with Bazzaz, 63 is the upper-most you can have an injector run, so it is equivalent to the injector being at about 100 percent duty cycle.

So, 63/100 = .63, then 1 percent on the Bazzaz is equal to .63 conversion factor. .63 * X = true percentage/the actual percentage of what fuel amount is in the cell... (?)

substituting for X: 30 * .63 = 18.9 percent actual fuel?

* Last updated by: JDC on 3/15/2010 @ 11:25 AM *