almost everyone is raving a bout the Angle GT's, how ever the Bridgestone BT-30's evo are about $100.00 or so a set cheaper. are the angle's that much better. Looking for decent mileage
* Last updated by: bbird1100 on 7/8/2017 @ 3:59 PM *
Created on: 07/08/17 01:27 PM
Replies: 6
bbird1100
Joined: 07/07/17
Posts: 6
hagrid
Location: pittsburgh
Joined: 02/16/12
Posts: 2212
Rook
Joined: 03/28/09
Posts: 20856
RE: bang for buck tires
07/08/17 7:02 PM
The only Bridgestones I have used are BT-003 and BT-016. Both were more than adequate for me on the track and street. I still think Pirelli anything is the absolute shit. I can see if you change tires every 2 months but for me tire changes are once/ year even with Pirelli race tires. I'll spend $400/set for the confidence they inspire + I am proud as hell to have them on the bike just for appearance purposes. I am trying to run a front/every 2 rears and that should help to keep the cost down.
bfg9000
Location:
Joined: 09/17/12
Posts: 19
RE: bang for buck tires
07/08/17 8:37 PM
Tires I've tried on my 2013 ZX-14R here in Philippine (3rd world) roads:
Stock OEM Metzeler Sportec M5 Interact = shit tires, no grip, rear lasted only 4K km
Pirelli Diablo Rosso II = good tires, great grip dry, average grip wet, rear lasted 4.5K km
Pirelli Angel GT = great tires, very good grip dry, good grip wet, rear lasted 6K km, same price as Rosso II
Pirelli Diablo Rosso III = so far good tires, excellent grip dry, good grip wet, yet to wear out my rears after 3K km, looks like they will last 5K+ km, 20% more expensive than Angel GT, tall profile... I have 1-inch chicken strips with street use (I have no chicken strips on Rosso II or Angel GT)
So far I still think Angel GT is the best in terms of bang for the buck.
Maddevill
Location: Hayward, CA
Joined: 04/23/11
Posts: 2672
Batt5
Location:
Joined: 07/28/15
Posts: 64
RE: bang for buck tires
07/14/17 12:36 AM
I am sold on the Metzeler M7rr as well... they stick like glue and instill confidence... Down side, like all performance tires (Low Mileage)... If you can get 3,000 miles out of a rear, that is all she wrote... 2,500 miles and they are looking kinda bad... But that is pretty hard riding on a heavy high horsepower bike...
These bikes are expensive hobbies...
Dave905
Location: GTA, Ontario
Joined: 07/15/12
Posts: 285
RE: bang for buck tires
07/14/17 11:08 AM
I must be an oddball but I HATED the front Angel GT. Harsh, really bad ride on my bike
I wholeheartedly agree! I tried to like them. I did 1 set of the ST's and 2 of the GT's and the fronts were terrible. Rears not much better. Just installed a set of Dunlop Roadsmart II's. So far, so good. Will have a better opinion of them once they're done.
New Post
Please login to post a response.