Thanks, Oz/Justin.
I sorta got the 3-D map showing a timed cell, call it. The longer the cell block, the longer the duration to start sooner at higher rpms.
So yes, you figure the reversengineering is if you can change a TPS number, you'll have to match that sort of pascal type math to calc from either table. So the math of the one number [pick either map] will alter the other map so it matches no matter who you enter on what map.
Since numbers are foreign to me, the formulas I'll screw up, rather, check the 3-D map. I can see how the low rpm range has this gully drop at the 1800 to 3000 rpm [cruise range]. You have to figure we are at that rpm in 6th on the highway. That sure looks like a leaner setting?
And when you are in the upper rpm, the 3-D map looks like a mountain ridge. So, this is where, now here is my approach of the thinking. I'm going to cut/paste the mountain ridge so it looks more like a horizon = Smoothing.
Now, this pops in my head as to see the pascal method of the sub vs. the TPS vs. the IAP. This tells me if this is an accel mode gully, meaning, set the closing of the sub here, so match the fuel here too?
We understand where yes, match the TDC and degree back from there? Now, watt is being used are the other numbers. I need the abstract of that number. I agree, Oz, it's a duty cycle number, but what is the range, if 14.7 is a range, and the vac goes from there is the cmHg range, then which formula are we using if the Pa is in pascals? That is reverse the engineering. Some math head could tell. It's all about the basics.
Steps to toggle and click are one thing... I'm now inside the box so... Now... Sea me in a pool of clicks inside, but I'm after something totally different in some way, inside?
Tormenting the motorcycling community one post at a time